In neutral evaluation, an unbiased third party such as a former judge or senior counsel, hears your case either through written briefs and/or oral presentations. They consider the legal merits of your case and give you their reasoned opinion.
Neutral evaluation allows disputing parties to better understand the strengths and weaknesses of their case and have a clearer sense of their positions. Embattled parties can receive a cost-effective and speedy ruling, avoiding hefty arbitration or litigation bills. The process is private and confidential.
Parties may use neutral evaluation to resolve entire disagreements or differences in opinion(s) on a single point of law and/or technicality to the dispute at large.
Neutral evaluation can be used for a wide range of disputes, such as
Parties will be able to tap the extensive experience and knowledge of the appointed expert, also known as the neutral evaluator. SMC’s panel of neutral evaluators comprises former judges and judicial commissioners, senior counsel and industry professionals who can render an evaluation on the merits of any matter.
Neutral evaluation allows parties to have a cost-effective and speedy ruling compared to litigation or arbitration. The process is entirely customisable; parties can decide on the scope of the neutral evaluation as well as the type of evaluation – whether it is a documents-only evaluation or an evaluation with hearing session(s).
Parties can choose whether or not to have a binding opinion. A binding opinion can be used to settle the dispute, while a non-binding one helps parties become more aware of the strengths and weaknesses of their case should they consider resolving the dispute through mediation or any other forum.
You can download the Request for Neutral Evaluation form and return the form to us by email. Click here for the prevailing Rules, Forms and Fees.
