At the beginning of a new year, it seems a good time to look back on some of the common excuses, sorry, reasons, for refusing to mediate that occasionally continue to circulate especially in litigated cases. 

Mediation. Arbitration. Conciliation. Three words that sound alike and come up frequently in the family law context but have different meanings and implications

A constructive and active dialogue during a mediation helps foster an understanding between the parties and bridge the gap, narrowing the issues for reaching a negotiated resolution.

Mediation  should be thought of as a conversation about the future, with the goal of reaching an amicable divorce  settlement that puts both spouses on the best path forward.

Working with egos and emotions is considered an obvious task for a Mediator and this responsibility is heightened when the parties involved are high profile individuals or global brands.

Virtual mediation has been a fantastic success and has enabled mediations to continue despite the pandemic.

Rule number one in any mediation? Don’t tick off the mediator.

“The biggest advantage of Mediation is that conversation/statements by Parties during mediation cannot be used against them in Court. This permits them to speak their mind without the fear of adverse consequences.”

Mediators from across New Jersey weigh in with tips for effective, resolution-oriented attorney-mediator relationships.

Mediation has been under-utilised historically as a means of dispute resolution in this area. Mark Blyth and Geoff Egerton think this is going to change.